|
常州翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：because the part of government subsidies actually doubled in four years, according to statistics, the U.S. government provided a total value of up to 30.5 billion dollars in subsidies. Of agricultural subsidies critics believe that "free farming Act" and for four consecutive years of huge subsidies to agriculture, which is rooted in the American farmers farm-step learn to walk, especially to support those family-type farmers. However, until today, people still do not see any American farmers have signs of self-reliance. Analysts believe that the problem lies not in the beneficiaries of these subsidies to help those most in need of small farmers. According to statistics, 70% of the annual subsidies are falling into a 10% share of the largest pockets of farmers, subsidies, not only do not help small farmers, large farmers favor the annexation of hand, these small family-type farms.(3) subsidies for agricultural disasters. From the perspective of government spending, the U.S. agricultural risk management policies can be divided into the following three categories: (1) disaster relief policy: is based on the annual case of natural disasters established, are of a proposed nature. Each varies greatly from year to year. Farmers in planting after the disaster did not know when the role was seen as "green box" policy. (2) serious disaster insurance policy: for each crop farmers only need to pay $ 60 fee, you can participate. Large low level of disaster insurance, the insurance applies only to the actual output is lower than 50% of normal production conditions. Actual output is lower than normal yields for some of the debts was 55%, that farmers get paid the amount of: (normal production of X50% - actual production) x55% X price. (3) multi-hazard insurance policy: from the category, it can be broken down into individual farm production insurance, a single farm crop revenue insurance, the county as the unit of production insurance to the county as the unit of crop revenue insurance. Inability to fully meet the WTO "green box" policy standards, but also because the U.S. policy of spending little yellow box, so the United States take the initiative of such insurance policies as amber box spending policy.
(B) EU direct subsidies to farmers
|