|
廊坊翻譯公司關鍵字：equilibrium, because the reform can not can not break no longer a group of vested interests has increased the interest of another group. Increasingly easy to asylum reform strategy, it seems that after receiving the first bitter sweet effect. Reform is not easy, and only two things you can choose: either tackling strategic risks, or shouting slogans local spin.In Russia, easy to find agricultural reform failed, and then hit hard. So easy to find, is modeled on China's agricultural reform route, from releasing the potential of peasant family-run start. However, things came into effect in China to Russia will not take effect. Be fair about the former Soviet Union and now Russia's agricultural policy authorities, implementation of agricultural family business, but to spare no effort. Read them on the land system of policy documents and laws you know, the completeness of their論文摘要翻譯英文 writing is far above the level achieved in China. However, Russia does not welcome it seems farmers set. This matter, in this author's view, to engage with the collectivization does not matter how long, but the same resource structure, the market畢業(yè)論文翻譯成英語文章 radius and density of urban layout and so on. From the beginning, the Russian Agricultural leave effective "support system" unable to move. Family farm could not handle, and later engaged in stock or could not handle a large farm in fact. Reform can not take effect quickly, because there is no such Chinese "small market畢業(yè)論文翻譯成英語文章 to support small-scale production" of the early reform effects. Food situation deteriorate further, forcing policy options to promote the radical reform of state-owned sector strategy. Anyway, the situation is already bad enough, not because of radical reform and worse. Aggressive strategy may be detrimental, but at least there is a benefit that is not in the state sector reforms gradual in "cooked", it is not particularly easy to clip to give birth to a "profit bureaucracy" to. In this way, directed at Russia's drastic reform crucial.There is no doubt that China and Russia in the level of development, economic structure, social and political traditions are vastly different in many ways. However, this does not prevent the two countries in transition, we find that there is a similar key. This is the original system, the administrative hierarchy of a large distribution system to be replaced by the free enterprise system. This is the key to effective integration of a large market畢業(yè)論文翻譯成英語文章, which is the key to continued in-depth reform of agriculture. From this perspective, China had started earlier, but it seems that has not yet been put into a real battle; Russia later, but has stepped into the rapids. Although the need to follow-up observation, the Russian strategy of radical reform to what extent the overall improvement of its agricultural "support system", and when the "support system" to further improve, the Russian agricultural productivity can continue to improve, but we can already Conclusion: Russia is China's agricultural problems faced by the early success of agricultural reform can not be answered. It touches China's agricultural reform in the early success of a pause, that China is necessary to take drastic measures to reform the state sector, Russia's experience in drawing the necessary nutrients. As we all know, "feeling the stones" is the philosophy of China's reform criteria. China since the 1980s touched a large stone, which is under the co-existence in the two-track gradualism increasingly grow in the anti-market畢業(yè)論文翻譯成英語文章 interests. Touched the stone, we can cross the river yet?
|