|
唐山翻譯公司關鍵字：Rural Development Institute Chinese Academy early in a study that, despite rapid economic專業翻譯公司服務最好的 growth in rural areas in the city, but the farmers are not much good, because the rural city funds have been siphoned off. The research found that between 1978 and 1984, rural reforms made by a total of about 60 billion capital finance, financial channels, the net inflow of rural areas from the city; in between 1985 to 1994, by contrast, 4000 billion net inflow of funds from the rural town; 1994, the national contribution to economic專業翻譯公司服務最好的 growth in rural areas, 3 / 4, but the relative living standards of farmers has dropped to a historic low, because the only city in 1994, pulled out from the rural areas the more than 1340 billion yuan of funds. [18]
When the resources are from the country有資質的正規翻譯公司哪個好side "learn" to the cities, the results appear quite natural that a thriving city and a relatively depressed rural areas. We can say that the bustling city built on top of the support of the state sector, but also to the condition of depression in rural areas. Allocation of resources "urban bias (urban bias)" is the process of economic專業翻譯公司服務最好的 development in many less developed countries in the common phenomenon, which causes low efficiency of economic專業翻譯公司服務最好的 development and unfair (Lipton). China has long existed in this phenomenon. This focus on only two points on the reality: first, why the first half of the eighties reform has effectively changed the economic專業翻譯公司服務最好的 policy專業翻譯公司收費價格 and income distribution "urban bias", narrowing the gap between urban and rural areas, and to nineties, but back to the urban-rural income gap between the pre-reform situation, even bigger than before the reform? Second, the widening gap between urban and rural economic專業翻譯公司服務最好的 prosperity of today's and tomorrow's economic專業翻譯公司服務最好的 development, what kind of impact? Now that China's urban-rural income gap between how much they going? [19] According to a study by China's National Bureau of Statistics [20], from 1978 to 1993, the real income of urban residents has grown steadily at an average annual increase of nearly 5%; and rural residents only in the early days of reform 1980 to 1985, income growth, real income growth every year since then, and only half of urban residents; Thus, from 1980 to 1985, the urban-rural income gap from 3.1:1 down to 2.3:1; However, from 1986 onwards, the urban-rural income gap to re-expand to 1997, urban residents per capita disposable income of rural residents per capita pure income ratio of 2.7:1 (1978 urban-rural income gap was once reduced to 2.37:1,1984 to 1.6:1).
On China's income distribution, there are many Chinese people to understand the errors. It comes to wealth, people will think of "big shots", the private owners, but these people probably in the whole Chinese society has only been up 1%, rely on their spending power, China's urban consumer market can not be so bustling. Rural areas, especially central and western regions and slow income growth for many reasons, such as low agricultural prices, agricultural production costs rise too fast, the development of township enterprises difficulties. These reasons are related to the allocation of resources in rural areas by the unfavorable treatment related. For example, the state finance to more financial resources for maintaining the city's low consumer prices, and not enough financial resources to improve the state-controlled price of agricultural products; state-owned industrial and commercial goods through the substantial increase in agricultural prices, rural enterprises use energy and raw material prices and industrial consumer prices, was a big profit; National Bank deposits transferred to the rural town of the state sector, making the township enterprises lack of funds; rural grass-roots administrative agency can not get enough money from the financial, so assessed on farmers turned to . In fact, these practices is the state sector "learn" the means of rural resources.
It is noteworthy that the slow growth of rural incomes and urban economic專業翻譯公司服務最好的 reform, almost in the same period; since the beginning of urban reform, the urban-rural income gap began to widen. This is just a coincidence? One explanation is that the reform of the state sector to invigorate the city, so the income of urban workers began to rise dramatically; other words, the income of urban residents and rural residents' income rising faster stagnation does not matter. However, the rural reform the rural economy more liberalization, the market mechanism has been dominant in the rural areas, why the income of rural residents falling instead of rising it?
|