|
鎮江翻譯公司關鍵字：The fundamental problem? Is that still exists between members of society are different economic專業翻譯公司服務最好的 interests. Whatever the social form, as long as such interest exists, it will inevitably be required from the system for the recognition and protection. Socialist society is no exception. Here, although production has been established in the production of public ownership; but because of this interest and the differences have not disappeared, and thus bound to the field and circulation in the distribution according to work through this wealth and monetary exchange system for the acquisition and possession of to be recognized and protected. On this basis, with changes in interest and differentiation, it will inevitably lead to the production areas back to the alienation of the system, and gradually grow out of production system to private ownership. It is natural to happen, because "the interests of the rule must show the property rule." ③ Turin had imagined a kind of "economic專業翻譯公司服務最好的 communes", where the recognition of equal rights of workers and the implementation of monetary exchange. In this regard, Engels commented: "He can not prevent things like this happen: Some people play a small part of the monetary savings, while others rely on the wages sufficient to maintain life." "Money for those who need to borrow money were stored." "Because money storage were able to force those who need money to pay interest, so usury is restored with the up ... ...." This is bound to appear at the communal house "private accumulation, thereby undermining the commune itself." ④ "Cultural Revolution" later, Mao Zedong pointed out that : "eight-grade wage system, distribution according to work, money exchange, which is not much difference with the old society." "So, like Lin Piao come to power, the capitalist system is easy to do." This is the meaning to say. In other words, recognition of material interests and the interests of the exchange, private ownership of factors will inevitably lead to gaps in public ownership within the economy of growth.Practice also shows that in this stage of socialism, the rural collective economy, the elimination of private ownership in itself is not complete, they can not completely, that had to leave a tail: allow members to retain a small amount of private plots and household sideline production. In this peasant household economy, because of its close ties with the market, differentiation is even more intense. In this regard, Mao quoted Lenin on small-scale production when spontaneously every day, to generate a large number of bourgeois capitalism and the words to illustrate. This is the collective farmers of this family economy is still regarded as "small producers" and "spontaneous forces of capitalism."
Mao Zedong's above assertion, while not without bias, but they can not deny the economic專業翻譯公司服務最好的 phenomena may well be on the deep history behind an insight into the law. The problem is: he is not admitted to this rule, but to try to eliminate this law; forced to carry out its way to break the law of the right stage of the struggle of assets, currency exchange restrictions and distribution according to work, cut off the tail of small-scale production. As a result, we can not but be poles apart, rampant underground economy, and economic專業翻譯公司服務最好的 development suffer. History tells us that there is no interest and the pursuit of different interests, not according to his work, currency exchange, private ownership of extinction to socialism, can not but fall; complete elimination of private ownership of the traditional socialist road leads to nowhere
|