|
武漢翻譯公司關(guān)鍵字：relatively simple phenomena and economic forms, Marx can not go beyond the age limit as a personal vision since the 20th century new forms of economic phenomena and economic, so to adapt to the economic theory of the 19th century in the future is still very difficult to play a fundamental guiding theoretical role. Marxist political economy was in a very long period of time has played a huge role, demonstrated its vitality and vigor, but with the economic development of the situation in economics is not the eternal truth is the work of truth, the basic theory of rigid discipline of the whole development will lag, and thus gradually behind social and economic development here, only the currency, for example, the definition of Marxist political economy in today's perspective may not be correct, the interpretation may not be reasonable, because of economic development size and economic impact of the new situation the emergence of new trading and trading tools, the establishment of Marxist economics is unpredictable era. It gives the political economy of Marx Marxist philosophy equal status so that future generations of blind worship is the real reason. Marxist political economy itself is beyond reproach, the problem is the attitude towards future generations, we can make this assumption, the introduction of Western Marxist political economy, economics, integration of the theoretical system has been considered incompatible things, it may cause Marxist political economy has been the development of quality, rather than stick to the old form. Comparison of Marxist political economy, western economics and changed at any time even with the need to change, in terms of a level which makes possible a greater theoretical innovation, more suitable for economic development, said the system as a whole another level, the basic theory is poor, is not conducive to long-term stable social and economic development, purely from a technical perspective, economic development is highly cyclical, these are strong supporters of Marxist political economy has been criticism of Western economics, but where is its variability easy to rebuild and there is no absolute authority was a step by step to build a reasonable theoretical framework of modern economic analysis and proper research methods. Tian Guoqiang second phase in 2005, "Economic Research" entitled "The basic analytical framework of modern economics and research methods" paper, to the domestic details of Western economics theoretical framework and research methods. In which he has been recognized with many of the status of Western economics as economists call it the modern economy (Branch) study, divided into micro-macro distinction only, rather than Chinese and Western. The other hand, Marxist political economics and western economics, and now the former than the latter compatibility. In recent years, Western economists launched a "Marxist hot" for many Chinese economists complacent and forget to think. Western economics are able to discard preconceived ideas absorbed Marxism, Marxist political economy has been stagnant Why, Why China's economic scholars are willing to self-satisfaction it? ! This only shows that the study of Marxism in China there is a problem, recently learned that the central works of Marxism to spend huge sums of money to build and create a number of first, hoping for China's Marxist studies open the way to the right. Economic impact of globalization on China's thinking of many economists hope to have some changes.
Chinese economics have to build the road requires a large number of impulsive noise is not the theory of moving the world economy scholars whom the effort to fight loneliness, need to create a pure economic research for the institutional environment (may wish to imitate Western life Professor of a similar system based on national circumstances). Shopping malls on the all-powerful official on the movers and shakers are not economics, sit tight back seat is economics. Understanding of economics, to understand economics, but also economics, true colors, is a priority. Western economics is not China can rely on to build the foundation of economics, has a rigid Marxist political economy also can not assume responsibility for building a Chinese economics. Economics will eventually form China do? China Economics ultimately what will happen? This is not to answer. In short, the economics of building a long way to go China, successfully or not, faces an uncertain future, the market to determine the final result, let us wait and see.
|