|
吉林翻譯公司關鍵字：privatization of property rights reform = (or, as mentioned by Comrade Liu Xiaoxuan "privatization"). If this reform continues, the state-owned economy back light, a sell, a delivery of the concentration of wealth in few hands, more and more poor people, or a socialist self-improvement that it? We are not re-take the peaceful evolution of the old you? Yes, we should learn useful things in Western economics, including the neo-liberal analysis of the different factions have adopted the attitude, not closed. However, we must distinguish two levels, namely, the ways and means of management and the basic economic system. You can learn more about the former, but also with China's reality; of the latter should adhere to its own direction, the former for the latter use. If you forget the basic economic system and their specific conditions, according to the kind of gourd painting, it is not non-westernized. Just think, if by the neo-liberal program to achieve "shock therapy" type or gradual privatization, that there is no socialist common prosperity? In fact, get rid of the dominant position of public ownership, celebrate the sacred tone of privatization has been very popular in many people, many cadres, especially some young people have lost confidence in socialism, the reform process in some parts of the state-owned assets has been very serious, many important natural resources for the "right money" forces of destruction and looting of collusion very impressive, major international financial risks are frequently threat to our economic security, not to mention the income gap has also widened.
Need to re-clear: China's reform and not from the neo-liberal line, but the basic principles of Marxism applied to China's practice, is the close integration of theory and practice of great innovation, the theoretical system of socialism with Chinese characteristics. In this process also draws on the experiences of other countries, but not neo-liberalism. Although the use of the term neo-liberal individual (such as property rights), but give it new meaning. Therefore, the neo-liberal theory and line with China's reform and not directly related. The small number of people affected by its impact, it is just the tributaries, it is clear that the negative impact of China's reform in order to better adhere to the established route. Moreover, we do not have the cage and the integration of the neo-liberal land grant, but did not see it as a "basket", but to clean up its damage socialism and national independence of the negative effects, avoid going astray.
Implementation of the "double hundred" policy must adhere to the mainstream of MarxismAccordance with the party of the "double hundred" policy, in theory, the dispute should be facts and reason, reasoning, can not refrain from labeling others, can not only be allowed to let other people talk about themselves. More importantly, the "double hundred" being there must be a main theme. Twenty years ago Deng Xiaoping once criticized this tendency: "Some people have the 'double hundred' policy of absolute freedom understood as airing, or even just to put the wrong things, not to the Marxist struggle. What this also contending? This put the 'double hundred' policy of the proletariat, Marxist principles, distortion of the principle of the liberal bourgeoisie. "In some of the major discussion on the issue of economic theory is useful. Criticism of the wrong ideas to give up, it means losing the ideological position of the sovereign. Mr. Liu Guoguang is really good, must not dilute the objective existence of ideological struggle. We should respond positively and strongly supports the initiative of Mr. Liu Guoguang. We have put forward the "Horse School" (Marxist) for the Spirit, "secondary" (Marxism with Chinese characteristics) for the body, "Western" (Western Economics) for the use of Chinese economic development, most scholars are now becoming more and more the consensus. Scholars who truly love the socialist motherland, should implement the "double hundred" policy in the growth of Chinese Marxism mainstream economics, to unite with each other, to better serve the great cause of building socialism with Chinese characteristics, service.
|