|
攀枝花翻譯公司關鍵字：property rights" grounds. China's scholar-entrepreneurs, former government researcher Liu Mengqi Development Research Center, pointed out at the same time there are some "China does not need reform, privatization of property rights," the main reasons are:
1, China's people now completely intolerable conditions of property privatization. Although the Chinese people against the planned economy, "a sophomore public", but not all at once in favor of privatization of state-owned enterprises. After all, in this "age of human rights", we can not be sacrificed for building a market economy in exchange for the majority of the people of the so-called radical, "rational." Reason is cold, gray, and the majority of the human rights of people is living, evergreen.
2, a market-oriented economy of high and low, is not absolutely dependent on the size of the privatization, and who depends on the configuration of resources. A fair exchange of equal value by the market allocation of resources, is the market economy; by the non-market configurations of various factors, such as self-sufficient, unified control of government, warlords plunder, evil exaction is not a market economy. For example, the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe and other countries following the dramatic changes, although the degree of privatization greatly increased, but their market-oriented economy and there is no synchronization, on the contrary, they are not market-oriented processes such as China.
Era of state socialism in China after the survival, stability and development of decisive significance, it is essentially "socialism with Chinese characteristics" in the economic field content. Because of this, so between the two extremes of socialism in China to find a balance. (The two extremes, one is North Korea's "clinging to the typical traditional state system", a former Eastern Europe, former Soviet Union, "is typical for the dramatic changes in the state-private ownership.")
Solving equations of China's economy: the virtual privatizationIn this dilemma, the "virtual privatization" seemed like a new way. The lack of public ownership of traditional energy, because it denies to exclude state-owned enterprise's reasonable private rights, pay rigid, state-owned operators can not legally claim the normal way to obtain the relevant private rights, and thus a two consequences: one is malpractice, "actively bring down the state-owned enterprises"; the other is, though not embezzle state assets, but the loss of business enthusiasm, mediocrity, "passive drag down state-owned enterprises." Liu Dahong pointed out that from the perspective of corporate governance, it is for this reason, the state-owned enterprises do not have the private sector is "business desire and vitality."
|